Why this matters: Brokers and agents maintain their licenses based on their own interpretation of the real estate market and how it affects fee-generating services. For those most invested in maintaining their practice — namely brokers — their steadily increasing decision to go inactive is following transaction volume.
Active licensees in the field
In April 2026, California had 84,237 active real estate brokers, about 2,500 fewer than one year earlier. Today, the number of active brokers continues to decrease, in search of a bottom since declining from the January 2010 peak of 109,500.
Conversely, the number of active sales agents steadily climbed from a 2014 low of 171,100 to a November 2022 peak of 226,300. Since then, agents have begun a slower descent than brokers and as of April 2026, active agent numbers tapered to 209,853.
firsttuesday forecasts a dramatic fallback in sales agent licensing and renewals in 2026-2027. The decline is the result of the 2021 pandemic surge in new licensees (which has already begun) and reduced present and future sales and leasing activity and branch office operations by employing brokers.
Watch for the next big wave of licensees after prices bottom — first with the return of speculators, then end-user homebuyers — to rebound the housing market, not expected until after 2028.
Updated June 4, 2026.
Chart update 6/4/26
| April 2026 | April 2025 | Annual change | |
| Active Agents | 209,853 | 216,411 | 3.0% |
| Active Brokers | 84,237 | 86,932 | -3.1% |
Today’s inflated agent-to-broker ratio
In a stable market, a natural equilibrium develops between active real estate agents and brokers. This ratio has historically found balance at the level achieved in 2002: approximately 1.5 active agents for every active broker.
As real estate transactions entered the recovery phase of a market cycle in the early-2000s, new agents arrived en masse for the Millennium Boom. The greatly inflated agent population grew to as high as 2.7 agents per broker as big brokers filled their cubbies. These individuals obtained a license with the optimistic belief that extra money was to be had working real estate.
The agent-to-broker ratio fell in the Great Recession 2008 aftermath of the Millennium Boom, and in seven years reversed direction in 2014 to begin rising again.
Currently, the ratio hovers around 2.5 active agents per active broker. In Q2 2026, we are four years into constantly lowered sales and leasing volume as we trudge our way past the disruptive pandemic economy and adjust to the current migratory and trade war disturbances.
Expect the current ratio to decrease through 2029, following the downward path of home sales volume to its bottom, not rising for another three or so years. The public is fast to respond and run with boom times, but very unwilling to leap before a rise in sales prices becomes a media headline.
Agents speculate on the market
The real depth of agent inactivity is obscured by active licensee figures. Many “employed” agents simply do not report to work – at least not as a real estate agent. Their license is left “to hang” with a broker. They are underemployed, working as part-timers when deals pop up, while they gear up in a different occupation, a drain of clientele from full-time agents.
28% of all 293,158 sales agent licensees report to the DRE as “inactive” – around 83,000 licensed individuals who are not employed by a broker. Many inactive licensees do speculate in property as principals or negotiate purchases for family members, often presenting themselves as holding a license.
Related article:
Licensing in an economic recovery
Will the ideal 1.5:1 agent-to-broker ratio return when a trough develops in licensee population in the late-2020s?
Probably. A deep recession appears likely unless another pandemic-level monetary and fiscal stimulus is again initiated as occurred in 2020, and again as infrastructure upgrading in 2023 with the present military-industrial expenditures.
With the pandemic stimulus well-implemented to pump up the economy, new sales agent and broker licensing jumped in 2021 as sales transactions accelerated. Greater numbers of new licensees arrived and an increased percentage of existing agents renewed their licenses. Real estate sales volume came to an abrupt peak by mid-2022. The following downward trend saw enthusiasm to become an agent rapidly wane, which continues in 2026 – and likely into 2028.
Related article:
Brokerage Reminder: CAR membership NOT required for MLS access
Boomtime distractions, consumer protection and DRE licensing
Mortgage rates do tend to decline in a recessionary period. Less costly money becomes extra mortgage funds for buyers of property. However, the better borrowing power at lower mortgage rates is very quickly absorbed by sellers raising prices rather than buyers acquiring property with greater amenities.
When news media reports a rapid increase in pricing, the appearance of profits generates increased numbers of new DRE-licensed agents. Most become employed by well-advertised larger brokerage operations and franchised brands.
With any boom, the standards applied by real estate service providers diminish in quality and quantity, temporarily set aside to cash in on the increased sales and leasing.
The DRE alone is tasked with actively protecting our consumer society from adverse licensee conduct. To do so, the DRE needs to become more aggressively involved during business recoveries. Initially, during the boom times, a tightening up of the agent licensing exam is needed to limit the licensing of new agents to the most qualified, persevering and committed individuals.
Whether the DRE is politically able to do this is questionable. The DRE faces opposition from big brokerage offices and their entrenched trade group. Large brokerage operations require a constant high number of agents-for-hire to blanket the market to capture rising fees when sales momentum takes hold.
Related article:
Market variables are changing
For the next years into 2028, fewer brokers and agents are needed to assist owners and users (aka sellers/landlords and buyers/tenants) to service the sale and leasing of real estate. It is simply licensee numbers adjusting to:
- the current cyclical multi-decade increase in long-term interest rates now underway, and
- the return of a focus on owning real estate to occupy it or for income over the long haul.
Related article:
Agent and broker population, past and future
2021 saw home sales volume leap as a result of historically low interest rates, individual stimulus checks and a fierce fear-of-missing-out (FOMO).
Sales agent numbers accelerated rapidly during 2021, and through mid-2022, with an influx of “quick-buck” real estate agents. As expected, these new-career agents dropped out as sales volume from mid-2022 through 2026 declined.
Easy money, all the time, does not exist in any industry due to inevitable recurring business cycles.
Related article:
Industry behavior
Large single family residence (SFR) brokerage operations with branch offices have always depended on a constant flood of newly-licensed agents to fill their cubicles. These brokerage operations generate a high turnover rate for agents. Freshly-minted agents burn through their family members and social contacts without a parallel personal marketing effort to brand themselves and develop a viable client base.
The big brokers and their office managers have been able to mitigate the eventual loss of sales production experienced by client-exhausted agents through aggressively soliciting new licensees as replacements (and all the personal contacts who come with them).
Previously, during the peak years of 2004-2006, new agents were licensed at the unsustainable rate of 5,000 monthly – almost five times the 2025 pace.
Despite this history, the number of new hit-and-run agents crept higher in the pandemic years of 2020-2021. And again, brokers spent little time training and supervising new agents and more time mining them for prospects.
Related article:
Pivot to find profits during a recession: Focus on homebuyers
Facing economic reality
firsttuesday forecasts an ongoing fallback in sales agent licensing in 2026-2027, the result of reduced buyer, leasing and MLO activity. Watch for the next wave of licensees to arrive, first upon the return of speculators, then end-user homebuyers, to propel the housing market into the next virtuous expansion period, likely after 2028.
When viewed in terms of disappearing short-term agents, rather than vanishing homebuyers — the rate of homeownership statewide was stuck at 55% at end of 2024 — what appears is an economic reality which forces employing brokers to:
- shutter their least productive branch offices;
- release the weakest office managers and under-performing agents;
- attempt to locate licensed agents who actually generate business;
- upgrade office locations and cut rent expenses by taking advantage of office and retail vacancies offering ever lower rent;
- develop new profit centers with service divisions for escrow, finance, homeowner/tenant insurance, appraisal/broker price opinions (BPOs), property management, investor syndication and other brokerage services; and
- require agents to “get back on the street” to engage in the community, gather property information in greater detail from local agencies, and smoke out new leads which generate transactions.
Related article:
Fee splitting problems
Gradually, the younger and more aggressive agents employed by large brokerage offices will look for new opportunities. They may become brokers or team up with other brokers and agents, transitioning into smaller flexible operations. Others with a long-term client base will join “rent-a-desk” operations to reduce the fee percentage extracted by the broker in anticipation of greater net earnings.
Agents jumping out on their own too often do not have the business acumen to set up and operate a broker office, whether they employ agents or operate independently. Their motivation is too often based on the belief, right or wrong, that their current broker is taking too large a share of the fees.
Survival and success
During short-lived bursts of speculative fervor, discussion of a stable, disciplined office environment sounds like nonsense to brokers and agents with a short-term outlook. However, real estate is not a business where you can “fake it until you make it.” Misrepresentations by non-disclosure (or otherwise) and carelessness due to inexperience undo agents quickly, as the market turns into a multi-year decline – a cyclical recession.
Brokers who learn to cut overhead and eliminate operating inefficiencies on early entry into a recessionary period, while beefing up their staff with competent agents and broker-associates are in the best position for the following long-term uptick in annual transaction numbers, likely to begin after 2028.
Employing brokers operating successfully through 2026 and 2027 will be defined by their ability to plan ahead for their needs.
A look ahead to reduced size of brokerage operations
Brokerage offices with fewer than 16 agents will probably continue to recruit agents in the manner they always have. Single-office brokerages traditionally recruit by local word-of-mouth referrals and family members.
Brokers maintaining a single office with a staff of agents and broker-associates tend to have several different types of business clientele. They do not focus on the numbers game of market share to drive property owners, buyers and tenants to their office for representation.
These smaller brokerage offices are the most likely to attract the more thoughtful agents who enter into the real estate industry. These entrants seek a long-term advantage of diverse training by teaming up with agents and broker-associates who work income property, land and property management as well as SFR and MLO transactions.
The broker takes charge
To operate a successful brokerage office, the broker needs to employ viable agents, those with talent and skill.
It is the maturity of the agents in a brokerage business model that produces the end result sought by successful employing brokers, i.e., broker fees. As in all service businesses, the linchpin for achieving success is the ability of management to orchestrate the efforts of agents to act and earn as permitted by DRE regulations and real estate law.
Brokers are best served when employing agents who practice beyond the small and limited circle of friends and family. Of course, some brokers dismiss the duty to provide training while supervising their agents. Brokers who do not dedicate sufficient time and energy to their agents will spend time and energy seeking replacement agents.
Brokers are more than distant observers limited to providing remote oversight for the agents and sharing fees. They or their administrative assistants and managers are required to supervise and police the business-related activities and conduct of the agents they employ.
Related video:
Policing of business-related conduct
Further, the broker needs to be actively involved in the agent’s fulfillment of the duties the broker owes to clients the agent has contact with. Thus, the agent knows from the beginning just what level of production their broker expects of them to remain with the office.
Accordingly, an office environment needs to nurture a greater probability of producing closings based on written client commitments to broker representation, purchase agreements, leasing agreements and mortgage originations, which collectively spell financial success for all involved.
I obtained my license in 2004 and my broker at the time handed me off to one of his other salespersons to train under. The broker and everyone else was too busy to train anyone, so needless to say, I became discouraged by the lack of professionalism. “Every man (woman)for himself,” so to speak, was the attitude I left with. I have kept up with my continuing education and my licensing, so I am looking into a establishing myself with a broker who is willing to invest his experitise and time into his employees.
So, not all salespersons are greedy and just in it for the quick money. Often, what I’ve been told by other realtors, training and commitment should be mandatory, not something left to chance. There is great opportunity in real estate, but also, great responsibility. I hope I am more fortunate this time around.
Mary i hear what you are saying. When I started I interview with 3 brokerages. I chose and still work at Keller Williams Realty. A classy place to hang my license. Try them. Let me know how it goes.
I was recruited by a KW Commercial broker to work in Northern NV and Northern CA/Lake Tahoe. Just at the start of my career but from what I’ve learned, Keller Williams and its system seems to be ‘the real deal.’
Not licensed yet, but building a pipeline of potential deals.
Will keep all posted.
Please I need to talk to real state broker
As soon as possible I have 2 houses and I am lossing one of than
So I need a broker to help me out
My number is 9092829665
The DRE is becoming the Gestapo— Hell the whole country is becoming the Gestapo
Very interesting article and comments. Let all licensed agents/brokers fight to keep the Department of Real Estate, seperate from the Department of Justice.
I would love to see the numbers pertaining to the “New” agents that have come out of the mortgage meltdown as compared to the true Professional Real Estate Agents that make a living in Real Estate. We have had an influx of new agents coming from the Mortgage Industry taking advantage of the contacts they had in mortgages to deal with REO’s and Short Sales. I’m guessing, but I believe that the number of agents who have left the business is even greater than this shows. Those opportunistic agents will only be here as long as their contacts provide them with business and then they will go to where the next quick buck is.
wow, I am so glad you folks were able to stay in the business and struggled, while some of us, would have been homeless, or we had children to raise…I love real estate and I want to go back to it, but with all the set up fees, the fees for this and that…how in the world am I suppose to do that? In my first time through real estate was back in 1980 to 1986, we had 15% interest in Illinois…I had great mentors and wonderful caring and helpful brokers. When I first started, I didn’t know anyone…I was terrified…all of the Realtors that were there had been there forever…they didn’t treat me different because I was new…they helped me, therefore I helped them. I actually sold. I loved the business…I went back, or tried to in 2008 out here in California…I went for a big company…I should have gone with Century 21 but because it was close to home and a smaller office, wanted to get my feet wet, things were much different here and the times obviously changed…I received zero help from the other Realtors, some of them were married, and had been in the business for years and years….I got no help…I waited too long, I shouldn’t have even chosen that office…hindsight is 20/20–so don’t be so harsh on people that you don’t even know…I will go back, I will be more selective in the office I choose…so until you know the circumstances you have no right to judge….
If we want to improve the industry we need to raise the bar for who gets or renews a license. If we raise the standards we can professionalize our industry more and get the “speculators” out.
But think about it? Who makes more money when we have more licensees? The real estate schools and the Department of Real Estate. They really don’t want to raise the standards. Then they would sell less courses and collect less fees.
Doctors and nurses and other professions regulate the number of new workers by their standards. Raise the standards…lower the numbers.
I don’t know about agent but I have seen some brokers that always push the client to buy. They even justify by saying things like ‘if you don’t buy, the market price is going up soon’, or you ought to offer full price or otherwise the seller won’t look at your offers. Ethics in this profession is very hard to enforce and more uninformed or naive buyers are harmed than being helped.
I have read many different posts and this is the most interesting article I have seen all week. Thank you for this!
Nacy is right that it’s way too easy to get an agent license. It’s also too easy to renew. I just did that and it was no sweat. But even worse for our industry is fact anyone can go to the SAR store and buy a REALTOR pin and pretend he is one. Just astounds me how little consideration we give to our reputation, as an industry. When I asked the clerk how he could justify selling those pins to non-members his reply was that they had to pay $2 more for the pin. Now that’s protection!
I agree with Joseph Sarria – instead of the DRE making it close to impossible to figure out what a broker has to do to get a NMLS endorsement on her license in order to do loans. The DRE could start by making it more difficult to obtain a salesman’s license…Now for the NMLS endorsement one must have a background check, pre-licensing education, SAFE act, 20 hours of education, take their test, have a credit check and fingerprints, not to mention NUMEROUS fees and charges…The NMLS website has to be the most confusing I have been in contact with so far, and I’ve been licensed as a broker since 1984 and licensed since 1976. Make it more difficult for the “newbies” – make THEM have a sponsor, and fulfill all the other requirements that the government keeps throwing up in front of us. I was an appraiser for several years until they required licensing. Could not find a sponsor. Got a trainees license, but could go no farther. End of story. Everything is becoming more and more difficult – EXCEPT the ability to obtain a salesman’s license. They are still cranking them out to flippers, etc.
The article hits it right on the money. The market is ful of agents when the business boom, and then they leave when things go bad. They are not true professionals, they are oportunistic and liable to do anything to close a deal. Therefore the high rate of fraud in the market. Flipping property, and working with crooked mortgage brokers and agents, who would forge any document to make the points. This is the people the DRE needs to get rid of, permanently. The image of the industry is in such disarray that a clean up is a most for it to recuperate its status.