The 10-year Treasury note climbed to 3.64% in Q1 2023, up from an average of 2.94% in 2022. The 10-year T-Note rate has risen from 2020’s record-shattering low, when it averaged a rock-bottom 0.89%.
Interest rates rise and fall in a cycle, and the current rising trend, which began in 2012 (interrupted briefly by 2020’s pandemic interference), will include two-to-three decades of rising interest rates. This will dampen future home price increases, as buyer purchasing power is continually reduced.
Lenders use the 10-year T-Note to determine a homebuyer’s mortgage rate. The difference between the note rate and the 10-year T-Note rate represents the lender’s risk premium, which covers potential losses due to mortgage default on a 20% down payment, private mortgage insurance (PMI) covering the added risk of a low down payment.
Historically, the risk premium spread between the 10-yr T-Note rate and the 30-yr FRM rate is 1.5%. However, this spread has widened to nearly 3.0% in 2023, roughly twice the typical risk premium. Today’s generous spread indicates lenders continue to pad their risk premiums in anticipation of future rate increases — and foreclosures due to defaults.
Updated April 20, 2023. Original copy released June 2012.
Bond market cycles
The average monthly 10-Year Treasury Note (T-Note) yield since 1900 is shown on the chart above. As demonstrated, interest rates on the 10-Year T-Note have shown an overall decline since 1980, following a rise from lows last reached in 1941. We can now see that 1940-1950 marked the beginning of what has become a 60-year rates cycle: approximately 30 years of rising rates, followed by 30 years of falling rates. This roughly mirrors the 60-year period prior to 1950, in which interest rates peaked in 1921.
As we make our way through the current 60-year rate cycle, firsttuesday expects another slow upward run in rates for 20-30 years from the bottom (2012), and then a reversal into rate declines as occurred following 1980. The interest rate on the 10-Year T-Note dropped as low as 1.47% in early June 2012 as the euro, the renminbi, and the Brazilian real all weakened against the U.S. dollar. These lows were extreme and are evidence of international monetary stress. The 10-year T-Note dropped even further in 2020, averaging just 0.89%. But this dramatic dip was but a brief departure from the longer rising trend that has since resumed course in 2021.
Mortgage rates have historically moved in tandem with the 10-year T-note at a 1.5% spread. However, this 1.5% spread was elevated – at around 1.5-1.7% – for several years following 2012. This spread averaged around 1.7%-1.8% in 2018-2020 as lenders, cautious about the future economic outlook, padded their risk premiums. As of March 2021, this spread has leaped to nearly 3.0%, indicating lenders are nervous about the years head.
Looking ahead to 2024 and the years beyond, 10-year T-Notes will continue their long rise. The upcoming period of rising rates is likely to last for quite a long time – two or three decades. The last three cycles in bond market rates have been extremely regular, according to Chris Watling of Longview Economics. A 27-year downtrend in rates (1922-1949), followed by a 32-year uptrend (1949-1982) and another 31-year downtrend lasting to the present.
While the regularity of this pattern of 30-year passages should be considered coincidental (they very easily might have been forty years, or twenty), precedent establishes that bond market rate changes are much slower and more gradual than, say, changes in the stock market.
Related article: Current market rates
Interest rates and asset pricing
In previous interest rate cycles, rates rose for approximately thirty years, peaking in 1921 and again in 1979 after rising from essentially zero in the late 1940s, following the recovery from the Great Depression.
In 1947, at the end of World War II, interest rates on the 10-year T-Note were near zero, much as they are today. Then, from 1947 to 1979, rates moved steadily upward. 1947 is a key year for other reasons as well: it marked the end of a recession, and a long-awaited return to prosperity after the Great Depression of the late-1930s.
When this interest rate pattern holds true, as firsttuesday expects, we now find ourselves at the beginning of a reversal in the real estate market comparable in type, if not in intensity, to the turnaround after 1947.
During the resulting half cycle of rising interest rates from 1949 to 1982, the wealth of investors increased even as interest rates rose, housing construction was very strong and employment and prosperity increased as well. The American Dream of jobs, cars and homes for all was in full bloom during this period.
We expect to experience similar conditions during the next two or three decades, into the mid-2030s (this time, hopefully without the stimulus of a war effort).
For the housing market, however, rising interest rates, even static interest rates, mean that there will be no short-term profits to be had from any increase in pricing.
The notorious “Greenspan Put,” which we have grown accustomed to seeing after every drop in interest rates, will not and cannot be repeated to artificially generate profits in any asset market – commodities, stocks, bonds or real estate. Mortgage rates are inextricably tied to bond market rates, and every increase in bond and mortgage rates means a decrease in a homebuyer’s purchasing power – the amount they can borrow based on repayment at 31% of income – and an increase in the earnings of the rentier class.
Thus, a buyer will experience a decrease in the amount they can pay for a home. Less money borrowed by homebuyers means lower prices received by sellers for their properties.
Of course, this annual decrease in purchasing power is fully offset in actual (nominal) dollar terms by the Fed’s monetary policy, which maintains annual inflation around 2%. This inflation is the driving force increasing wages from year to year. As in the period of rising bond and mortgage rates from 1949-1982, prices will be held down, rising only in response to consumer inflation as permitted by the Fed and any “price appreciation” at the property’s location (appreciation occurs solely due to demographics, as demand for real estate within an area increases with a rise in the area’s population density or an increase in the income of that population beyond the rate of inflation). [For more on price evaluation, see the RPI Income Property Brokerage (IPB) suite of forms]
Related article:
Using the yield spread to forecast recessions and recoveries
Interest rates in the modern day
The Fed ceased its final round of quantitative easing (QE3) in October 2014, promising to keep the short-term interest rate low (around 0.25%) until the economy improved sufficiently. The Fed stated their intention to raise interest rates by the end of 2015, and finally increased the short-term rate by 0.25% in December 2015, and several times in 2016-2018. Once it was clear an economic recession was imminent, the Fed began to take their foot off the gas, letting rates fall back beginning in 2019, rapidly dropping rates in 2020 when the recession coincided with the pandemic and markets panicked.
While FRM rates hit historic lows in 2020, they will continue to rise over the long term. As rates continue to increase, agents will need to learn quickly to cope with an unfamiliar set of investment and pricing challenges (including different income multiplier/capitalization rates, long-term holding periods before profits can be taken, and Due-On Sale clause assumptions).
The key lesson to remember in the upcoming years will be that real estate is most properly priced and held for its inherent rental value. Those who buy property for speculative gain, not rental income, will see as little success in gains from a flip as those who invested in the real estate market from 1950 to 1980, when mortgage rates moved slowly, steadily upward until they exceeded 18%.
The next peak in rates, whether or not they reach past heights, will likely take another 20+ years to arrive. But this last cycle’s days of steadily decreasing interest rates, accompanied by steadily falling rents, producing ever increasing prices and profits (and §1031 hysteria) have run their course to the bitter end.
Related article:
Changing dynamics in the years ahead
In the last two decades, it was possible to purchase a parcel of real estate, vacant or improved, and take a profit, much greater than the rate of consumer inflation, merely by holding that parcel for a short period of time. This is no longer an option.
Prices may rise in narrowly defined locations enjoying a population density explosion, but most will be dampened by constantly rising interest rates which will keep prices from rising faster than the rate of core inflation.
The negative pricing effects of increasing interest rates can be at least in part counterbalanced by improved zoning. If property prices rise beyond the rate of inflation, local governments will have to permit density to increase to accommodate those who are attracted to the area or suffer the consequences of an asset inflation bubble.
Smart investors will look to purchase property in urban centers which have already begun to establish themselves as the most desirable abodes for the next generation of homeowners and tenants. In the long run, investors in real estate will need to increase their wealth, not by flipping their properties for profit, but by generating rental income over the course of long-term ownership.
Income property will be bought to be operated and managed for an annual net operating income, capitalizing at the rate proper going forward. In boom times, property owners were accustomed to capitalization rates (cap rates) of 6% or less. For the upcoming years, 10% may be more normal.
Prudent property selection, careful research, forward-looking capitalization rates and a long-term commitment to real estate ownership will be the keys to success in the new paradigm.
Related article:
“But this cycle’s days of steadily decreasing interest rates, accompanied by steadily falling rents, producing ever increasing prices and profits (and §1031 hysteria) have run their course to the bitter end.”
Steadily falling rents? Really! You need to proofread your articles.
Jack,
Thank you for pointing out this potentially confusing sentence. We have clarified, referring to this last cycle rather than the one we are currently in during 2019, in the copy above.
Best,
Editorial Staff
12-13 From the observation data above, it was seen that the longer synthesis time generated aurantiol with greater refractive index, density, and specific gravity. This was due to the increasing quantity of methyl anthranilate in the aurantiol product, in which methyl anthranilate had the biggest density. So it can be concluded that the duration of synthesis time was directly proportional to the refractive index, density and specific gravity of the aurantiol product.
This article leaves out several issues. For example, the article does not take into consideration the fact that the world today, thanks to the internet is now based on a world economy and does not include the current economies of China, Russia, Japan and all of Europe. Plus, the article also leaves out discussing inflation and the national deficit. When the current administration is no longer in office the national deficit is predicted to be over $20, TRILLION and climbing. The current inflation rate is actually 11.5% and when the Carter administration left office inflation was 14% and 30 year interest rates were at 18%. Plus, prior to the Clinton administration, the 30 year loan was tied to the 15 and 30 year bonds. During the Clinton administration, interest rates were changed to the short term 10 year loans.
I believe that the we are about to see interest rates rise like they did during the Carter administration and this is based upon the deficit and the rate of inflation. The only way that I believe that hyper inflation and the deficit won’t enter into this scenario is if a major war is started. According to the fact that the war on terror is once again getting out of control and our military is once again the size it was prior to World War II, and the fact that former Russian dictator Gorbachev said last week as reported on Fox News, that Putin is preparing for a nuclear war. According to defense one.com, the U.S. Department of Defense is in the process of making plans for World War III. Therefore, there is a very good probability that hyper inflation will not happen due to the possibility of war.
I would love to see the article rewritten with these issues taken into consideration with the all of these issues brought into consideration.
Interesting!