The rising trend in California construction starts

Single family residential (SFR) starts rose 6% over one year earlier in the six-month phase ending August 2016. Multi-family construction starts have decelerated, and having actually decreased 14% from a year ago.

Despite multi-family’s down performance in 2016, demand for multi-family rentals has generally been higher during this residential construction recovery compared to new SFRs. However, buyer-occupant demand for SFRs is gradually increasing as jobs are recovered.

SFR construction reports showed a 14% increase in 2015 over 2014. Homeowner vacancies are currently level with their historical average, thus SFR construction will have to increase to meet any future rise in demand. Expect SFR construction to continue to rise by about 10% through the end of 2016, though the increase will be dampened by rising mortgage rates in 2017.

Likewise, multi-family construction reports showed a 21% increase in 2015 over 2014, driven by the continued demand for rentals. However, the trend reversed direction in 2016, and the number of multi-family starts is likely to end the year about 10% below 2015.

Updated September 30, 2016. Original copy posted November, 2012.

Chart 1

This chart illustrates the number of California residential construction starts during bi-annual  periods ending in July and January.

Chart update 09/30/16

 Six-month period ending Aug 2016 Feb 2016 Aug 2015
SFR Starts 26,600 19,700 25,200
Multi-family Starts 23,500 26,700
27,300

Chart 2

Chart update 09/30/16

  2016 forecast 2015 2014 2005 peak
SFR Starts
48,500
44,100
38,600
154,700
Multi-family Starts
48,100
53,500
44,300
50,300

*Forecasts are made by first tuesday and are based on current new home sale trends, actual construction starts and current government policies. Detached single family residential construction trends in California:

  • 26,600 SFR starts took place in the six-month period ending August 2016. This is up 6% from the same period one year earlier, amounting to an increase of 1,400 starts.
  • 44,100 SFR starts took place in 2015. This is up 14%, or 5,500 starts, from 2014.
  • The trend in the total number of SFR starts in 2016 is expected to be a slight rise of about 10%.
  • For perspective, this cycle’s peak year in SFR starts was 2005 with 155,000 starts. The lowest year was 2009 with 25,000 starts.
  • Final reports issued for new subdivisions by the California Bureau of Real Estate (CalBRE) have remained constant for several years, roughly level during the past 12 months.

Detached SFR forecast:

  • first tuesday‘s forecast for total SFR starts in 2016 is 48,500. This is 10% higher than 2015.
  • SFR starts will begin to rise more noticeably in 2016, slowing in the second half after mortgage rates rise.
  • Subdivision final reports will continue strong as developers continue to sense a return of home buyers is on the horizon.
  • The next peak in SFR starts will likely occur during the boomlet period of 2020-2021.

Multi-family housing construction trends:

  • 23,500 multi-family housing starts took place in the six-month period ending August 2016. This is a decrease of 3,800 starts or 14% from the same period one year earlier, a reversal of the generally positive trend experienced in multi-family starts since the end of the recession. 
  • 53,500 multi-family housing starts took place in 2015. This was up 21% from 2014.
  • For perspective, this cycle’s peak year in multi-family housing starts was 2004 with 61,500 starts. The lowest year was 2009 with 11,000 multi-family housing starts.

Multi-family housing forecast:

  • first tuesday‘s forecast for total multi-family housing starts in 2016 is 48,100. This is a 10% decrease from 2015.
  • Multi-family housing starts will continue increasing at a year-over-year decrease of roughly 10% throughout 2016.
  • The next peak year for multi-family housing starts is likely to be 2020.

Statistics related to California housing:

  • 6,851,400 owner-occupied housing units existed in California in 2014, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. This is an increase of 1% over the prior year.
  • California population growth is increasing at a rate of just below 1% per year, having bottomed at the height of the Millennium Boom and trending upward slightly since then.
  • 16.3 million people were employed in California in July 2016. This is 781,500 jobs above the pre-recession peak month of December 2007, according to the California Employment Development Department (EDD), yet to catch up with the 1.2 million increase in working-aged population.
  • The trough month for employment was January 2010, with 13,686,400 people employed state-wide.
  • The rental vacancy rate in mid-2015 was 4.2%.

Construction starts will continue to rise through 2019, at least. The pace of this rise is dependent on several factors, discussed below.

Related articles: Nobody’s home: California’ residential vacancy rates Golden state population trends

Key factors for builders

How do builders decide when and where to build? Builders analyze existing home sales, end user demand and local employment. Together, an analysis of these and ancillary factors produces a prediction of future construction trends.

End user demand drives sales

End user homebuyer-occupant demand will ultimately determine whether and how fast construction starts for SFRs and condos will continue to climb. Currently, speculator acquisitions at less than 25% of ownership turnover — while significant to interfere — no longer dominate California’s home sales volume. This intervention subsided through 2015 and will continue at an even lower rate in 2016. As prices slip in 2017, expect speculators to return to grab up properties in anticipation of continuous price rises into 2019-2021.

However, builders rely upon buyer-occupants to support new home construction, deliberately culling out speculators as buyers in staged tract developments and slow selling projects. Buyer-occupant demand to purchase a home in 2016 remains stunted. This is demonstrated by relatively low sales volume participation and mortgage origination figures. Builders will continue to bide their time until sales volume figures for buyer-occupants pick up, likely in 2018 as prices begin to rise again.

Employment drives demand

When speculators interfere, home sales volume and pricing display a distorted picture of demand. However, builders need to look to jobs data and mortgage rates as the primary impetus for demand when they set the level of starts that will likely sell.

California has finally recovered all jobs lost in the Great Recession but at wages which do not cover the interim inflation. Still, considering the intervening population gain (around 3,000,000), full employment and labor force participation comparable to the December 2007 peak is not expected to be reached until 2019.

Obstacles facing SFR builders

Obstacles of concern to future construction starts include:

  • speculators and syndicators dumping the fast building shadow inventory of their circa-2012-2014 acquisitions back on the market;
  • slipping rent rates in the suburbs, weakening in concentric circles from the coast, due to competition by absentee owners for SFR tenants;
  • rising mortgage rates — ARMs first, then FRMs later — reducing homebuyer borrowing capacity before completion;
  • leased-out urban condo projects built but yet-to-be-sold due to the Great Recession, part of the shadow inventory builders have to watch out for in 2018-2020;
  • an upturn in foreclosures/REO resales and bankruptcies to re-occur after mortgage rates begin a sustained rise, likely in late-2016 into 2017 as part of the home sales price downturn in the current price bump cycle; and
  • California’s 490,000 negative equity (underwater) homes inhibiting turnover as of Q2 2015, which will increase in numbers with the downturn in home prices in 2017.

Until these factors are considered and a conclusion reached, builders (and their lenders) may not take for granted that construction starts will pay off. Expect starts to only modestly increase until these factors collectively improve, around 2018.

Related article:

California Residential Vacancy Rates

Related posts

5 Comments

  1. William MansfieldWilliam Mansfield said:

    Lots of useful information, thank you. I noted the construction chart going back to the 1980’s. The chart shows a total collapse of multi-family development beginning about 1986. I wonder how much of this may have been caused by the Reagan tax changes? Prior to that there was a period where limited partnerships built or bought apartments and commercial properties. After the tax change many people decided it was better to invest in a larger personal residence rather than a small income property and the limited partnership industry disappeared. Any thought on how tax law and government policy other than zoning laws can affect change?

  2. MUNKI said:

    If you add factors of living in CA… it is extremely costly. Land banking will do good but… having such a high tax state with cost of living so high… plus capital gain on both Federal and State end… does it really make sense???

    I used to be positive about CA… real estate… as an investment…
    Your own home, ok, but mortgage plus high property tax plus all others…
    What is your intake?

  3. Richard Heim said:

    New construction will only come back when we stop some of the wayward government t programs. No more debt forgiveness and no more refinancing underwater properties (Harp). It’s time to let the marketplace get back to normal buyer and seller demand conditions so employment will return and demand will new homes will follow. Just hope we elected the right person this time around.

  4. ATHENA TUTORIAL ACADEMY said:

    THE BLACK SWAN

    It interests us how so many persons, when offering their predictions as to what turn future events and trends might take, virtually NEVER figure in a black swan event.

    What is that? A black swan event is a dramatic, even cataclysmic event that comes on suddenly and unexpectedly and can have a drastic effect on any prognostication based solely on observable, historical, or cyclical trends.

    The huge storm in the East–hurricane Sandy–is a type of black swan event. A huge earthquake would be one on the West Coast. Such things can turn the trend-lines upside down. Massive damage means massive reconstruction. Is it good or bad for the economies so affected?

    MASSIVE SOLAR EVENT IN THE NEAR FUTURE?

    And no one is figuring in the possible catastrophic solar event that astrophysicists are saying could very likely hit before the end of 2012 or during 2013. (for more info on that see: AthenaAcademy.net/home/current_news). Would such an event bring negative consequences or positive? Apparently Earth has gone through such monumental solar events in the past.

  5. BigIrr said:

    Builders are “Re-active” to demand. They are NOT Pro-Active and build for the DEMAND. Long term investors shoot for 5-10 years out like me. I bought thousands of Acres in 2009 to 2012 at the BOTTOM BOTTOM LOW! Builders are consumers of LAND.

Leave a comment below, or start a discussion about this topic on the first tuesday forum!

*

Top