The belief that real estate agents must be silent on the tax aspects of a sale persists among our readers. In a recent first tuesday poll, a whopping 88% of voters said real estate agents are not permitted to provide tax advice to clients. Only 9% believe tax advice is within an agent’s purview, while 3% are unsure.

A year earlier, poll results revealed fewer readers were opposed to providing tax advice: then, only 76% of voters said agents cannot advise on tax aspects of a sale, while 21% believed they can. 3% were unsure.

Tracing agent misconceptions

We know many agents erroneously believe they cannot give their clients advice on the legal and tax aspects of a transaction, but why?

Much of the confusion is rooted in the trade union’s — the California Association of Realtor (CAR)’s — code of ethics, which discourages agents from sharing their insight about the tax aspects of their clients’ transactions.

Further, the boilerplate statement in the trade union’s listing and purchase agreements incorrectly implies real estate brokers and agents are not qualified to give tax advice.

Yet, real estate licensees are not only permitted to share their hard-earned tax knowledge, but may also be required by their agency relationship to do so depending on:

  • the scope of the agent’s knowledge;
  • the type of transaction; and
  • the client’s intended use of the sales proceeds.

Related article:

Providing tax advice to clients


When to advise on tax aspects

All brokers acting as agents owe a general duty to disclose material facts known to them about a property. Brokers further owe their client a specific duty to advise on the consequences of material facts known by the broker to exist in the property and in the transaction.

Thus, a broker who determines the tax aspects of a sale may affect their client’s handling of the sale has a fiduciary agency duty to disclose their knowledge on the tax implications. A prudent listing broker will extend their guidance beyond mere tax information to help their client achieve the best tax outcome possible.

For example, tax aspects of a sale are a material fact to a client in a §1031 transaction. Here, as a matter of basic competency, brokers and agents handling the sale will possess an understanding of the fundamental tax concepts affecting the sale and disclose this to their client.

However, a statutory exception to the disclosure duties exists on one-to-four unit residential and commercial properties. Here, a seller’s agent has no duty to disclose their knowledge of possible tax consequences, even when tax implications are known by the agent to affect the client’s decision on how to handle the sale of the property. [Calif. Civil Code §2079.16]

In this case, clients are expected to obtain tax advice from competent professionals other than the real estate broker handling the transaction. [CC §2079.16]

The listing agreement needs to specify the broker and broker’s agents do not undertake the duty to advise on the tax aspects of the transactions. However, on a direct inquiry from their client, the agent is required to respond honestly and to the best of their knowledge. [Carleton v. Tortosa (1993) 14 CA4th 745]

The Agency Law Disclosure addendum attached to listing and purchase agreements further eliminates the duty of a broker and their agents to disclose their knowledge about the tax aspects of a sale when affected property is involved. [See RPI Form 305]

Shifting reliance and avoiding liability

Brokers and agents who do provide tax advice are best served by always involving the client’s other advisors, such as their attorney or tax accountant. Input from other professionals eliminates future claims arising from adverse tax consequences said to be due to the client’s reliance on the agent’s opinion.

The most practical method for avoiding liability is to insert a further-approval contingency provision in the purchase offer or counteroffer.

The contingency provision requires the client to initiate an investigation by obtaining additional tax advice and further approval of the transaction’s tax consequences from an attorney or accountant before allowing escrow to close.

Under these circumstances, a broker can offer their earnest tax advice but still ensure their client ultimately relies on the more comprehensive information provided by tax professionals.

So, while advising clients on the tax implications of a transaction is typically not a required duty of a real estate licensee, it is certainly not prohibited and may, in fact, increase an agent’s marketability by widening the range of services and advice offered to clients.