This form is used by a buyers agent when presently retained under a Buyer-Broker Representation Agreement by entities seeking to acquire an interest in a property, to extend the period of representation.
The “Buyer-Broker Representation Agreement” has long existed as a “Buyer’s Listing Agreement”
Standard custom for setting fee arrangements, long enforced by the real estate trade union, has been dramatically reversed due to the National Association of Realtors®’ (NAR’s) March 2024 settlement. In response, prior California case law has fast bled into legislation.
As a result, fee arrangements for buyers agents working with individuals or entities seeking to acquire an interest in property are mandated to be in writing to enforce collection of a fee.
Specifically, legislation now requires a buyers agent – not the sellers agent unless acting as a dual agent – to enter into a written employment agreement when their buyer client seeks to acquire an interest in any type of real estate. [See RPI Forms 103.1 and 103.2]
The employment agreement provides upfront disclosure of the brokerage fee to be earned by the buyers agent for acquisition services. Further, the writing establishes the buyer will pay the fee, unless pushed to the seller. In either circumstance, the fees are included in the total purchase price the buyer offers to pay to acquire an interest in property.
The written Buyer-Broker Representation Agreement is entered into by the buyers agent:
- as soon as practicable (ASAP) after determining they will be representing the prospective buyer client; and
- always before the buyer signs an offer to acquire an interest in the property. [Calif. Civil Code 1670.50(a)]
This buyer-agent conduct with their buyer, in and of itself, is not a new or novel employment arrangement. Rather, this codification is a welcome advancement on a well-worn and storied theme.
For decades prior to the settlement rattling the trade union’s “gold standards,” a buyer’s listing agreement was used by a buyer to employ a broker and their agents. The agent then locates qualified properties for the buyer to purchase, exchange or option, as authorized under an exclusive right-to-buy listing. [See RPI Form 103-1]
As with an exclusive right-to-sell listing, the exclusive right-to-buy variation contained provisions for a brokerage fee earned and owed as negotiated with the buyer, not the seller or the sellers agent. The buyers broker fee is paid to the broker at the close of escrow from funds for payment of the purchase price, when the buyer acquires property described in the buyer’s listing (representation) agreement.
Editor’s note – RPI (Realty Publications, Inc.) has published an exclusive right-to-buy listing agreement since 1981, induced by the California case decision of People v. NAR. [People v. National Association of Realtors (1981) 120 CA3d 459]
So what has materially changed in the past several decades?
Not much, actually.
The new statutory title is Buyer-Broker Representation Agreement. It is fundamentally a new name for a long established employment contract. The name “representation” was conjured into existence in the wake of the recent NAR antitrust case settlement, codifying some of the new nomenclature to replace the name “Buyers Listing Agreement.”
The operative components of the representation agreement entered into between a buyer and a buyers broker, as negotiated by the brokers agent, contain the same essential provisions:
- a description of the real estate services to be rendered by the buyers agent;
- the fee to be paid to the broker;
- when the fee is to be paid; and
- the conditions for termination of the employment. [CC 1670.50(b)]
The Buyer-Broker Representation Agreement also contains the same boilerplate notice already required in all employment contracts a broker uses to establish their right to a fee, such as any listing agreement:
NOTICE: The amount or rate of real estate fees is not fixed by law. They are set by each Broker individually and may be negotiable between Client and Broker.
Editor’s note – Ironically, this is likely the same verbiage the trade union would have preferred to have been surreptitiously dropped from this new form. [Calif. Business and Professions Code §10147.5(b)]
Written documentation of the client’s obligation to pay a fee — here, being a written fee agreement negotiated and signed by the buyer — has long been legislated and judicially mandated as a requisite to the right to enforce collection of a broker fee on a contemplated purchase transaction entered into by the buyer.
But there is another minor difference apart from the name and mandated use of the employment agreement. The Buyer-Broker Representation Agreement retainer period is now limited when the buyer is an individual. This is in contrast to buyers which are entities, such as:
- corporations;
- limited liability companies (LLCs); and
- partnerships.
The broker’s retainer period for services to be rendered to individuals under a representation agreement may initially run no more than three months from the date the agreement is signed and received by the broker. [CC §1670.50(d)(1)]
However, when the buyer-client is an entity, they may agree to a retainer period for whatever duration the broker and buyer negotiate. Further, the expiration of an entity’s retainer period may be extended by modifying the representation agreement. With an entity as the buyer client, the broker is unrestricted by the three-month limitations on the retainer period which exist when representing individuals. [CC §1670.50(d)(1); see RPI Form 103.1A and 103.2A]
Editor’s note – An intervivos trust, also known as a living trust, is not an entity but is an individual. The buyer is the individual who established the intervivos trust and is the initial beneficiary with the right to remove the property from the trust vesting.
The expiration of the retainer period for an employment with an individual buyer may not be extended automatically or otherwise. However, the buyer-broker representation agreement may be reset for a new three-month retainer period by a separate renewal agreement entered into with the buyer. [CC §1670.50(d)(2)]
When the employment objective has not been achieved and the individual buyer intends to continue to work with their agent to locate and acquire a suitable property, the Buyer-Broker Representation Agreement may be renewed by using a written renewal agreement form, dated and signed by all participants. [See RPI Form 103.1A]
This is also but a minor variation on an existing theme.
Previously, an exclusive listing needed to contain a specified period of employment set by an expiration date of the employment, say, three or six months, after its commencement. When an expiration date is not included in an exclusive listing, the broker faces suspension or revocation of their license by the Department of Real Estate (DRE). [Bus and PC §10176(f)]
As before, use of an exclusive employment agreement provides greater incentive for brokers and their agents to perform their duty to work diligently and continuously to meet their buyer’s objective.
Form navigation page published 09-2024.
Form published 2024.
Form-of-the-Week: Buyer-Broker Representation Agreements and Renewals — Forms 103.1, 103.2, 103.1A and 103.2A
Article: Buyer-Broker Representation Agreements: The end of the “gold standard”
Word-of-the-Week: Exclusive right-to-sell and right-to-buy listings
Brokerage Reminder: The buyer’s listing — a prerequisite to representation
Brokerage Reminder: The buyer’s listing — the listed buyer benefits
Book: Real Estate Principles, Chapter 25: Operating under a buyer’s listing
Book: Real Estate Practice, Chapter 16: The buyer’s listing agreement
