Foreclosed homeowners now have the option to repurchase their old homes back from Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac at today’s fair market value (FMV). Previously, the government-sponsored enterprise (GSEs) only allowed foreclosed homeowners to reacquire their properties upon paying the outstanding mortgage amounts, which were — with rare exception — well above FMV.
The new policy aims to reduce the enterprises’ remaining real estate owned (REO) inventory. To qualify, the homeowner must:
- be at least three years past foreclosure; and
- intend to use the home as their principal residence.
Nationwide, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac hold 121,000 foreclosed homes.
Too little, too late?
A fine step in the right direction — too bad it’s not 2008.
The number of REOs in California’s resale market is nearly back to normal, at a level consistent with the early years of the Millennium Boom. Likewise, California foreclosures peaked in 2008 — nearly seven years ago — therefore, individuals willing and likely to repurchase their old foreclosed homes this late in the recovery are nearly nil.
That being said, this belated form of principal reduction (or cramdown) is better than nothing. It just would have been even more useful if it had come sooner. Especially considering prices which peaked in Q3 2014 (now declining), today’s FMVs are still very high — unless potential purchasers wait several months for prices to bottom.
There are those who balk at the thought of granting cramdowns to “undeserving” homeowners who defaulted on their mortgages. But cramdowns are not about making things more fair —cramdowns are about restoring normalcy to the housing market, particularly reducing those remaining REOs. However, given that seven years have passed since the foreclosure crisis began, the REO market has already nearly righted itself on its own (with many REOs currently in the possession of investors, not end users).
I find it hard to believe that many Investors have been/are buying homes in foreclosure in Calif. After the change that gives the previous owner an up 2 year right to rescission of the sale if they feel they were under rewarded, I can’t believe very many foreclosed properties are attracting investors.
What am I missing here?
I really don’t understand this article. How they are going to bay back the homes if they homes were already sold to somebody else in between… This article doesn’t make sense.
Stella Bonin,
The new policy covers homes acquired by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and still in their inventory (REOs). These homes are often vacant or rented to the foreclosed homeowner.
Regards,
ft Editorial Staff
How is it that poor people are undeserving, and The Rich, our Owners are ‘deserving’.?
Our Owners – of us slaves, here on THeir plantation, stole our stuff from us in the first place – stole the money – with which they bought the laws that let them. – and let them make those wars all of them, to conquer more land and labor…
Do we even KNOW that’s what they do?
you couldn,t have worded it any better. We are still feelin the pain,most people lost the
The American Dream,
DMC, Inc. v Downey Sav. & Loan Ass’n (2002) 99 CA4th 190, 120 CR2d 761, junior lien reattaches.
I absolutely agree. Title insurance in these cases would be a nightmare.
If memory serves me correctly you would have to be careful about other liens that may reattach when they come into title again. Sold out juniors may have their lien revive. I will look into the case law on that and put it back out here.
I am sick and tired of waiting for government policy to right the wrong that many, including myself, have endured during the past seven years. We, like many others, lost pay due to the STATE’S poor management of it’s budget (my husband and I are both teachers) and WE are now having to endure a three year penalty on top of everything else. Take the three year penalty away for those that now have regained their financial stability and let us back into the housing market!!!!!
More lipstick on a pig!
Let me see if I have this right; the former owner is allowed to re-purchase a now foreclosed home when it is an REO, but cannot purchase until 3 years have passed since a foreclosure (according to the FHFA link provided), or, someone on behalf of the former owner can buy it a fair market value. Of course, the person buying on behalf must live in the property. If the buyer has a family, where will the former owner go? This is absurd!
There is no way for the former owner to purchase the property with the 3 year stipulation, and if someone else buys for their behalf, what guarantee or protection is there that once the 3 years passes and is ready to buy, that the person who bought it, and is living there, will release their interest. If that property is worth $50,000, or even $10,000 more in 3 years, why would they sell it, unless it is sold at fair value.
Again, where is the benefit to the former owner?
Same ol story, bureaucrats sitting around thinking up stupid ideas to justify their overpaid salaries.