34,949 homes closed escrow in California during December 2013. This is up 5% from the prior month and down 12% from one year earlier when 39,760 sales took place.
Related article:
December’s 12% year-over-year decrease continues the downward trend experienced in home sales volume throughout most of this year. At this time last year, home sales volume was still high, riding the wave of low interest rates. However, increases in both home prices and mortgage interest rates stifled upward movement in sales volume in 2013.
2013 ended with 446,419 home sales, roughly level with the 449,059 home sales in 2012. Home sales volume remained down by around 40% from the peak year of 2005 when 753,876 sales closed escrow.
first tuesday forecasts a slightly weaker home sales volume for 2014 than experienced in 2013. This reflects the 2010-2011 experience in home sales volume as it occurred after the 2009 tax stimulus. 2012-2013 received a similar “stimulus” from speculators who propped up sales volume and prices. Now, as they continue to exit the market in 2014, expect sales volume to reduce and prices to slip, as sufficient end user demand is still lacking due to slow job creation and high mortgage rates.
The bumpy recovery pattern continues — but the ride is getting rougher, and the duration frustrating. California’s real estate sales volume needs about 60,000 homes sold monthly to fully recover. That recovery is dependent on 18-24 months of annual California job growth exceeding 350,000-400,000 jobs. We are nowhere close at this point in the recovery, but likely will be around 2016.
Related article:
Other key factors controlling California’s housing market sales volume follow.
Absentee homebuyers: to hold or to fold?
Absentee homebuyers (speculators, buy-to-let investors and renovation contractors) continue to decrease. Absentee homebuyers accounted for 26% of Southern California (SoCal) December sales volume, down slightly from the prior month and down from 30% one year earlier.
December 2013 represented the lowest share of absentee homebuyers in SoCal since November 2011, a sure sign speculators are continuing to exit the market.
Absentee homebuyers made up 23% of Bay Area homebuyers in December, up from 21% in November and down from 26% one year earlier.
Speculators chase upward price movement, but sales volume has been softening for 11 months. Once released, December 2013 data is expected to show a slip in home prices. Thus, expect absentee buyers to comprise a smaller percentage of monthly sales into 2014.
Cash purchases (two-thirds of which are made by speculators) remained abnormally high in December, representing 28% of SoCal sales volume. However, cash sales decreased steadily in 2013, and are currently at their lowest volume since September 2010. In a normal market, cash purchases represent around 16% of all buyers, comprised mainly of end users.
The percentage of sales attributed to cash purchasers will trend downward well into 2014, as speculators abstain in reaction to slipping prices.
Bay Area cash sales were 23% of home sales in December 2013. This is down from 30% one year earlier.
Speculators remain motivated to buy only so long as they believe home prices will rise quickly. Expectations of a quick resale have faced the headwinds of falling sales volume since November 2012. The numbers indicate reality has begun to set in. Expect a speculator mass exodus when prices follow sales volume and mortgage rates, and take a sympathetic nosedive. Prices have likely already begun to slip.
The annual increases in the buyer purchasing power index (BPPI) came to an end in June 2013, dimming the prospects of flipping for a profit. Sellers ignore these trends at their peril.
When speculators realize they cannot make a short-term profit as soon as anticipated, most will quickly leave the market or resort to Plan B to hold for another five years. The inventory they dump (today’s growing shadow inventory) will need to be consumed primarily by end users and income property investors. However, there aren’t enough of these buyers ready and willing to sustain even the current low sales volume. Thus, expect prices to remain level to down through 2015.
At the moment, end user demand is half of what is needed for a normal 60,000 monthly sales volume.
Related article:
Jumbo loans: room at the top
Jumbo loans (loans over $417,000) accounted for 28% of SoCal’s December 2013 sales. This is up slightly from the prior month and up from 23% a year earlier. Jumbo loans were at their peak in mid-2007, when jumbo loans consisted of 37% of SoCal sales.
Jumbos financed a whopping 49% of Bay Area sales. This is down slightly from the prior month and up from 40% a year earlier.
Jumbo use has risen statewide as sales of high-tier properties have accelerated — particularly in the pricey Bay Area with its greater concentration of new wealth — since 2009. Despite this increase, jumbo use remains far below its peak in 2006-2007 when buyer overreaching maxed out.
Related article:
FHA-insured loans: a window is closing
Federal Housing Administration (FHA)-insured loans made up 20% of December SoCal mortgage recordings. This is down slightly from the prior month, and down from 23% one year earlier.
FHA-insured loans made up 11% of Bay Area mortgages in December. This is up slightly from the prior month and down from 14% one year earlier.
California’s appetite for FHA-insured loans is waning: FHA-insured loan use is around its lowest level since late 2008. first tuesday anticipates the share of FHA-insured loans will steadily drop, hitting a bottom of 4% of loan originations around 2018. High (and rising) FHA insurance premiums make conventional loans with private mortgage insurance (PMI) more appealing, as they ought to be.
The FHA has gradually tightened buyer standards to protect their mortgage insurance fund, with a limited exception for buyers who have very recent foreclosures or bankruptcies. Nonetheless, FHA-insured financing remains popular as a loan of last resort for determined first-time homebuyers with low savings and less than ideal credit scores or debt ratios.
Related article:
ARMs: holding lenders at bay
Adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) made up 13% of all SoCal mortgages in December 2013, more than twice the 6% share one year earlier. SoCal ARM use in December remained the highest since mid-2008, the heart of the recession. ARM use made up 13% of all SoCal sales in July 2008.
ARM use in the Bay Area was at 22% in December. This is up from 20% in November and up from 11% a year earlier. Cash transactions in the Bay Area are slipping, a warning that prices are being supported by ARMs. If this trend continues into 2014, the Bay Area will certainly be in a bubble and due for a crash-like adjustment in sales volume and prices.
ARM use will remain relatively low statewide until property prices rise more than 5% annually for at least two years. This probably will not happen with the current price trends. When it does, ARM use will increase as agents push homebuyers to overreach on amenity value, appraisers drift away from comparable pricing and, inevitably, lenders relax credit standards. This is unlikely until the next big bubble, expected to occur around 2018-2020.
Related article:
Re: California December home sales from DataQuick
Dear Christopher,
Thank you for your question. first tuesday’s forecast for a 2018-2020 bubble is based on market analyses of trends in interest rates, demographics and the jobs market.
The Federal Reserve is expected to raise rates in late 2014-2015. This in turn will dampen home sales volume, which is already weak due to low buyer-occupant participation and a still-recovering jobs market. With that in mind, we expect home sales volume to recover around 2016.
However, once jobs are fully recovered, members of Generation Y who have been putting off purchasing homes due to unemployment or underemployment are finally going to enter the housing market. Simultaneously, members of the Baby Boomer generation will begin to retire in earnest. This great confluence of new buyers are expected to create a housing bubble — granted, smaller than the Millennium Boom, but a bubble nonetheless.
Regards,
Carrie B. Reyes
Writer, Editorial Staff
What is the source(s) of the market predictions (I.e. The next big bubble is 2018-2020)? Are these predictions based on the market behavior and data set that we’ve experienced in the last few years? a larger historical real estate cycle pattern? Or a combination of both?