Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (collectively Frannie) will soon participate in California’s Principal Reduction Program (PRP). This reluctant change of heart was prompted by the announced June 2012 removal of the rule requiring lenders to match any funds PRP offers homeowners.
PRP has been around since February 2011 as one of the federally funded efforts of Keep Your Home California, but has seen little bank participation due to the requirement forcing lenders to match any funds PRP provides a homeowner receiving a principal reduction, otherwise known as a cramdown.
To qualify for PRP, the homeowner must have a mortgage both owned and serviced by participating lenders, thus Frannie’s participation is crucial, as it owns 62% of home loans in California, according to the state’s attorney general office. However, even at its best, the program will only be able to provide cramdowns to 9,000 California homeowners due to the minimal federal funding available and lack of lender contribution. California has 2,041,276 homes with a mortgage exceeding the value of the home, according to the most recent data from CoreLogic. Thus, this program will be able to offer cramdown assistance to just 0.45% of all California underwater homeowners.
To qualify for PRP, a homeowner must have:
- ownership and occupancy of the home as his primary residence;
- a home loan which is both owned and serviced by PRP participants;
- a first mortgage originated on or before January 1, 2009;
- an unpaid principal balance on that mortgage below $729,750;
- a loan-to-value (LTV) ratio greater than 115%;
- an income which meets county-based income limits;
- completed and signed a Hardship Affidavit;
- an income able to sustain the modified payments set by the servicer; and
- defaulted on the mortgage or be in imminent risk of default.
Other changes include increasing the maximum total allowed contribution from PRP to $100,000 per household. This is up from PRP’s $50,000 contribution toward principal reductions, which the bank was required to match prior to these revisions. Thus, even without the fund-matching requirement, homeowners may essentially receive the same maximum principal reduction with PRP’s increased contribution.
Bank of America (BofA) is the sole large lender currently participating in PRP, and is only approving homeowners who also qualify under the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). Thus, homeowners with a loan serviced by BofA may combine benefits from both PRP and HAMP to allow for the most affordable revised payment plan.
If BofA services the loan, the homeowner must contact BofA directly to apply for the program. As for other lenders, homeowners may contact Keep Your Home California at 888-954-5337 or their servicer to begin the application process.
first tuesday take
Any principal reduction by Frannie is definitely a step in the right direction. With PRP paying for everything, their very limited funds are absorbed that much faster, limiting the number of homeowners who will be able to take advantage of the benefits. However, since most banks refused to go Dutch on cramdowns, this is an inevitable solution.
Still, lenders benefit from PRP as it assists homeowners avoid default, which in turn helps lenders keep their portfolios in the black – essentially an unearned gain for lenders who are the only financial winners in this game as the homeowner had nothing and still has nothing, but a fresh start with no equity – but also no negative equity.
Related articles:
We applaud BofA for being the first (and only) big lender to step up to the PRP plate. Currently, there are 14 servicers participating, though the other heavyweights, Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase, have said they will evaluate the program’s changes and then consider participating. We’ll see.
Re: Keep Your Home California Announces Program Changes To Help More Homeowners Qualify for Mortgage Assistance from Keep Your Home California and Fannie, Freddie are set to reduce mortgage balances in California from the Los Angeles Times
Not so, there are lot of people who were stupid buyers in that mkt as they put 20% down and are paying mortgage because it is morally right thing to do. I did not take money out and did not lie to get loan. I can make the payment. But how long those millions of people like me will pay on negative equity home. I may not recover my down payment even if I get cramdown. but, I would have money to spend/ contribute to economy if I know that I am paying to own a home without negative equity. So, money would go to consumer economy and not to banks that continue to gamble same way they were before crisis e.g JP Morgan recent hedging.
I can’t believe you guys at First Tuesday. Just another liberal attitude, and another example of rewarding those who least deserve it. What about buying down the mortgage balances of those homeowners who have remained current and paid their mortgage faithfully? The majority of homeowners who are upside down lied about thier income and assets in order to purchase more house than they could afford. And many of them stole the equity from their homes as they refinanced and took the cash out. These loosers have already been more than rewarded for their dishonesty, and you want to reward them even more. When the housing market turns around these jokers will again make out as they sell their homes and again make a profit. But the poor person who didn’t get this stupid tax payer gift, along with the taxpayers funding this program, will be the loosers.