How will mass deportations of undocumented immigrants affect California's housing market?
- Negatively. (37%, 240 Votes)
- They will have no impact. (33%, 214 Votes)
- Positively. (30%, 190 Votes)
Total Voters: 644
President Trump recently characterized his deportation plans as a “military operation.” While members of his administration later clarified that no military force will actually be used, strong rhetoric like this, as well as memos directing law enforcement to deport any and all undocumented immigrants they encounter, make one wonder about the future of California, whose economy depends upon our undocumented immigrant population of roughly 2.6 million individuals.
This article does not address whether undocumented immigrants ought to be here in California or not. But it does examine what will happen to our state when deportations occur.
California’s agriculture, hospitality and construction industries all rely on the cheap labor supplied by undocumented immigrants to keep prices at the level that consumers demand. Mass deportations of undocumented immigrants will decimate these industries, the impact rippling throughout California’s economy — including our housing market.
Trump’s plan widens the net from the 1.4 million undocumented immigrants targeted for deportation under President Obama’s policies to nearly 8 million people nationwide, according to the Los Angeles Times. This includes any individual who has been charged for a crime (even those who haven’t been convicted) or who is believed to have committed an act that may warrant being charged for a crime.
How will more deportations impact the housing market? For the answer, a look back at recent history is required.
Deportations fueled the foreclosure crisis
A greater share of Latino/a homeowners lost their homes during the foreclosure crisis than any other ethnic group, according to the Center for Responsible Lending. While this was partly due to the shockwaves of predatory lending during the Millennium Boom — when lenders targeted minority homebuyers for subprime mortgage products — the full story is more complicated.
3.6 million individuals were deported from the U.S. from 2005-2013. The number of deportations steadily increased each year, with about two-and-a-half times as many individuals being deported in 2013 compared to 2005, according to the journal Sociological Science. This activity continued and increased throughout the recession and foreclosure crisis.
While about 66% of undocumented persons in the country are Mexican or Central American, a whopping 94% of these deportees were Mexican or Central American.
In a New York Times interview with the authors of the study in Sociological Science, they claim many Latino homeowners rely on at least one undocumented immigrant to provide for some or all of their expenses. About one-third of undocumented immigrants live in owner-occupied homes. Therefore, when that person gets deported, the household loses that income stream. When the household can’t make up the difference, a home sale or foreclosure is imminent.
The authors liken deportation to a divorce, death or other major life event that can lead to foreclosure. Further, as detailed in a Federal Reserve Bank of Boston study, the number one reason for a household to default on their mortgage is losing a major income stream.
The last foreclosure crisis dragged down home values, spread blight and caused other sectors of the economy to suffer. Future deportations on any large scale will only harm California’s housing market.
How many homes will be foreclosed upon if mass deportations occur in California?
Say Trump’s administration is successful at deporting the entire population of roughly 2.6 million undocumented immigrants in California — a most unlikely feat. Since one-third live in and contribute income to owner-occupied homes, about 860,000 homes would be at risk for foreclosure. For perspective, that’s about 12% of California’s 6.9 million owner-occupied homes.
The rest of the undocumented immigrant population — about 1.7 million individuals — lives in rentals. Mass deportations of these individuals will put landlords in a bind.
However, the administration is unlikely to be able to deport undocumented immigrants at the large scale their plan calls for. The government simply lacks the resources (or public support from the many industries that rely on undocumented, cheap labor) to do so.
Therefore, future deportations may make a dent on our economy and housing market, but the impact won’t be catastrophic. The size of the dent will depend on the magnitude and duration of deportations. Four years of consistently higher deportations will slowly eat away at California’s economy and housing market — unless our state acts to stop deportations from getting out of hand.
California is home to several “sanctuary cities” which refuse to cooperate with immigration officials, including Los Angeles and San Francisco. A new bill is currently moving through the state legislature which may turn the entire state into a sanctuary for undocumented immigrants. Senate Bill 54 continues to advance despite Trump’s threat to withdraw federal funding from sanctuary cities.
Whether or not this bill ends up becoming law, California will weather the storm. How do you see future deportations affecting California’s housing market? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
Related article:
ITIN mortgages for homebuyers without social security numbers
Somehow I can’t believe that a prospective buyer would rely on an illegal immigrant’s income to support debt service to any significant degree. It’s such a challenge for purchasing homes in CA that most buyers would not want to risk losing their equity relying upon a questionable source of income. I am assuming that Illegal aliens are on the lower scale of income and work for unreported cash. I’m not sure how they would could launder enough of their income to legitimately support debt. The lenders are too cautious and scrutinize unverified income. I don’t see deportation as a crucial factor in the real estate market.
There are NO mass deportations. If your illegal and you have a felony, a run in with the law then ur under scrutiny.
Mass deportations is an myth. Its a spin to panic latino voters…
Despite the above article, I am in favor enforcing our laws. An illegal is just that. Illegal!
Does Randall Durham also want to enforce our laws regarding employers that hire undocumented immigrants? Such employers should be arrested and prosecuted but, few people ever bring THAT subject up.
Absolutely! It would only take a few big name examples to get everyone on board with compliance.
I need to take classes to update my license. I won’t be using First Tuesday. I’m tired of fake news and I won’t support propaganda organizations. There are other companies I can use to take my classes.
Same here.
The problem with this article is the headline. She goes on to say that mass deportations are not likely to happen and she is right. I’m not sure what the answer is to “illegal immigration” but as with a tub that is overflowing you cut the water off first… Logic would have it that we stop the flow if illegal immigration then find a solution for those already here. I believe most but not all have good and right intentions. And, I will say that making California a sanctuary state is absurd.
In summary, for real estate valuation purposes the illegal immigration problem will have little to no effect with the possible exception of isolated pockets.
Regardless, who is not for rooting out criminals regardless of their legal status? Are we worried that the guy that makes meth in the basement and gets busted can no longer afford the mortgage? I don’t think so.
I agree. Good points.
Logic would have it that we all look at the facts, first. My understanding is that more undocumented persons are leaving the U.S. than are coming in at this time. So, lets all do some research and find out the truth vs. believing in bumper sticker statements.
Illegal is illegal period.
Wages should go up to a fair wage without illegals.
In the jobs that they hold now.
Just look at other states.
First Tuesday need a to stop watching CNN! Not everyone in CA is a flaming liberal!! I’m getting so tired of this BS!!!
AMERICA FIRST!!!!
Lisa, I totally agree!
I totally agree also
UNDOCUMENTED MEANS ILLEGAL!! … GET THEM OUT EN’ MASS!
As for First Tuesday… you just showed your TRUE COLOR… so NO MORE “LAST TUESDAY” for me!!
Since when has Tuesday publications become pundits for political policies instead of journalism for the Letter.
Your statistics are inaccurate and are set forth to create fear in the minds of Realtors.
Illegal is illegal, Undocumented means nothing; have they lost their documents that were never earned,?? Ridiculously thwarted.
After 30 years in this business, I have seen it all and heard it all, but thIs is by far the most aggregious, ridiculous and dishonest reporting by a group that wants to play an integral part in the Real Estate Industry and Economics.
I will never read or subscribe to this inflammatory ‘journal’ again..
Paula’s is one of my favorite comments. I agree Paula. You’re right. Let’s stop having FT ever talk about “political policies instead of journalism.”
Oh….wait. Journalism IS about politics. Take journalism out of politics and you are left with a Dick & Jane First Grade Reader. Well, then I mean FT should only talk about things I agree with. “Illegal is illegal,” Paula said so. That’s pretty simple. Paula said “Undocumented means nothing.”
Listen to Paula, she is so right. “Your statistics are inaccurate,” Paula said. She shows us how, where, or what statistics are right. Oooops….no she didn’t. Her comment is “undocumented.” Her comments mean “nothing.” She said so herself.
Lets not read First Tuesday anymore unless you’re Moscow. I hear Beonce…to the left, to the left. I thought this was a Real Estate mag? Why would illegals be able to get a mort to buy anyway? Bleeding heart lib. I’ll go to Hollywood and get a Frre Press next time i want to “feel your pain” lol Clown
Dear PauleeV. That’s not “Beonce,” Be-once….? it’s Beyoncé. But then you couldn’t be expected to learn how to spell someone’s name who different from you, could you?
And psssst….PauleeV, Moscow doesn’t read. It’s a city.
Stop reading FT? I am sure you’ll be back next month, unless you Be-once here to ramp up your rage. You love your rage. Like your pet rat.
Pretty insulting reply, Jason! The article is full of holes and First Tuesday should be more alert in publishing such loose writing!
hey look everybody … a libtard snowflake