The amount and quality of supervision brokers offer their sales agents varies considerably from brokerage to brokerage. In many brokerage offices, a lack of supervision has led to negligent behavior from sales agents. A newly licensed sales agent with little to no supervision from their employing broker is more likely to make mistakes, costly to them, their brokers and their clients.
first tuesday proposes that newly licensed sales agents be required to serve as apprentices or trainees for a set amount of time, say two years, before being able to practice fully.
Compare this training period with the requirement for new appraisers to undergo training and satisfy experience requirements before being licensed.
For example, a new appraiser needs to obtain a combination of experience which includes:
- carrying out several instances of the full appraisal process under the guidance of a supervising appraiser;
- completing a work log;
- reviewing others’ appraisals; and
- assisting in preparing appraisals.
Much like new sales agents, appraiser trainees receive lower rates of pay than fully licensed appraisers, as a portion of the appraisal fees collected goes to the supervising appraiser.
The supervising appraiser needs to review and accept responsibility for all of the trainee’s appraisal work. They may have no more than three trainees under their supervision at one time.
This requirement protects members of the public — buyers and sellers— from inexperienced appraisers, who have the ability to derail sales, mislead lenders and set false home value expectations.
Sales agents fresh from their education likewise lack the necessary experience to advise buyers and sellers, as they have no knowledge of licensed activities beyond general real estate concepts. The “dumb agent” rule no longer cuts it for today’s more knowledgeable population of buyers and sellers. Agents are expected to provide real value beyond access to the multiple listing service (MLS), and that value is gained through experience.
In the case of real estate agents, the proposed training would require each new sales agent to assist a supervising broker in various types of transactions. After assisting more experienced agents, the trainee would serve as the lead agent for several transactions under the supervision of a responsible, supervising broker. Over time, the agent will learn to legitimately address the concerns of buyers, sellers and investors, including issues regarding:
- taxes;
- title;
- property boundaries;
- homeowners insurance;
- mortgages;
- foreclosures, short sales and real estate owned (REO) property;
- appraisals;
- disclosures;
- staging;
- fair housing; and
- local housing market fundamentals.
Of course, many sales agents already undergo some form of training before they begin taking on clients under an employing broker. But this requirement would formalize the process and ensure a more educated, experienced crop of sales agents — and fewer mistakes.
About fifteen years ago I was asked to broker an office of brand new loan people. The man requesting usage of my license
Had set up a new office with computers, phones,, decor, etc. . It didn’t take long for me to realize that the man who
Wanted to supervise the office himself, was not even licensed. He could see quick bucks. He was very resistant to me wanting to
Review files and make suggestions. He hired a girl with a provisional license to run the office. We had several frustrating meetings where he expected me to butt out until I
Decided that what he wanted was a Rent-A-Broker situation. He bent over backwards to keep me from looking at the work and the files the new loan agents were producing. I contacted DRE explained the situation and pulled my license from this nightmare. He went broke and lost His investment and had to close the office. He had gotten investors to fund the fancy office for him. He hired two more
Brokers after me which did not work out. Evidently the general public is not aware that the broker is responsible for what happens
Under their license. This guy was hiring young kids with no licenses because he was going to train them himself into making quick loans.
I agree with the person wanting to have loan agents apprenticed before turning them loose on the public.
After all the time, money and effort I put in trying to upgrade my trainees appraisal license, I could NOT find an appraiser who
Was willing to take me on as an apprentice.. the excuse was that whatever work was out there they did not want to share.
There was not enough work for the people already licensed. It would be easier to supervise a new real estate agent because most brokers would welcome new agents. Not so with appraisers. Might I add that I had been appraising for a couple of years prior to licensing requirements. Most frustrating time of my life.
Having been both a real estate agent and a loan originator, I would suggest that loan originators need this requirement EVEN MORE than new real estate agents do. There are way more opportunities for a loan originator to fudge a deal.
I feel it depends on prior experience in other Real Estate fields as well as a college education to make a determination if a new agent needs to serve as apprentices or trainees for a period of two years. If a Brokers wants good Agents working for them under their Brokers License it is expected of them to train and supervise their new Agents under California Law. It is Law not an expectation for Brokers. If Brokers cannot follow the guidelines under California Law then they should not have any agents working under their license period. Also to all new Agents, before you go for an interview with a Real Estate office or Broker, please verify with the State of California Department of Real Estate if there were any prior or pending law suits against the Brokerage or Real Estate Company to determine if this is someone you really want to work for and associate your name with as well as jeopardizing you license.
Gentlepersons, as always your memoranda of change-agent ideas continue to offer creative solutions to astute California brokers.
Unfortunately, too few brokers fit into the category of MANAGING BROKERS. The business of realty brokerage has become a numbers crunching exercise for middle management MBAs servIng the interest of stockholders of publically held mega corporations. These outfits are guided by executives who know mostly what they learned academically about agent-client relationships and day-to-day issues and legal requirements of representing clients in closed transactions.
So many licensed real estate salespersons have been led to believe a real estate license as a quick and cheap ticket to exercises of wealth & greed and a stepping stone to implement personal ego goals.
In the sixties, real estate salespersons were required to possess a two-year real estate sales license prior to sitting for the broker’s exam. Your idea of an apprentice-tutoring time for new entrants into the game of Real Estate Sales is a great but retrospectively was found many years ago to be impractical plus verification & accountability was impossible to track.
Moving forward to our marvelous digital age; most old line and new growth on line brokerages have only internal inexperienced pseudo checky-box contract review employees that only minimally meet CaDRE & legal requirements for field sales brokerage oversight and compliance in the transaction process much less guide (in an apprentice training time – as you astutely suggest) the rookie agent in representing the company client-principals in the A to Z process of brokering real estate.
Most important this “tutoring and hand holding time” for salespersons beginning a real estate brokerage career would be required to be legislated…are you kidding? Never happen! While many of us agree with you in principle the Big Cartel will off-rail real professional improvement into oblivion…but carry on with your great ideas anyhow. LeMoine Bond Realty Counsel CaDRE 00287022