Do you think buyers should be able to have direct access to property information in your local MLS?
- No (56%, 146 Votes)
- Yes (44%, 113 Votes)
Total Voters: 259
This poll will close on April 6, 2020.
Posted by ft Editorial Staff | Mar 23, 2020 | Reader Polls, Real Estate | 4
is the production staff comprised of legal editor Fred Crane, writer-editors Connor P. Wallmark, Carrie B. Reyes, Amy Platero, David Swistock, consulting instructor Summer Goralik, graphic designer Mary LaRochelle, video instructor Bill Mansfield and video editors John Rojas, Quinn Stevenson and Jose Melendez Avila.
Buyers and sellers already have access to this information. MLS should have tried to evolve and provide additional value instead of sticking their head in the sand and trying to maintain their monopolistic power over the market.
This is kind of a stupid question as buyers have had access to the MLS for years via my website, Realtor.com, Zillow, Redfin etc…..
I agree, since damage is done and now we have no option other than allowing access to public. Which brings us to a new dilemma of how to compete. Similar to Expedia taking over travel agents’ jobs.
They don’t, via Zillow et al, have access to “private” comments, access codes etc. (At least AFAIK.) How do you get around the need for a listing broker – who has to be a licensed human. How would a web site get around that requirement? I guess people could act as their own listing agent and post on Zillow et al – directly. The parties then wouldn’t know how to deal w. all the red tape involved. More work for escrow officers or attorneys in states where RE sales are “processed” by an atty.