A public agency considered undertaking a large development project and conducted a closed session to discuss the deal. The agency posted an agenda of the closed session with a description of the broad range of items to be discussed about the project. A local prosecutor sought an opinion from the Attorney General, claiming the wide range of topics discussed in the closed session exceeded what may be kept confidential from the public. The California Attorney General in an opinion stated closed sessions must be limited to discussions regarding the price and the terms of payment for the purchase of the property, since the public’s access to public information requires all else to be discussed in open sessions. [_Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen._(December 29, 2011)]
About The Author

Carrie B. Reyes
is the Senior Editor at firsttuesday. Carrie obtained a Master of Arts degree in Theology, Philosophy and Ethics from Boston University. Carrie has worked at firsttuesday for 12 years and is the lead contributor for all real estate market analysis and economic content. When she’s not covering the latest real estate story, Carrie enjoys volunteering at her local animal rescue.
Related Posts
Latest posts
- Notice of Cancellation — Due to Contingency or Condition — RPI Form 183
- Waiver of Contingency — RPI Form 182
- May an owner evict a tenant when the owner is not in compliance with notice requirements regarding a change in the name of the property management company?
- Duty of Care and an Evolving Standard of Conduct
- To syndicate or not: a securities risk (or not)